[討論] 足總可以如何處理疑似假球？

足總章程細則第23條第4款：
Misconduct-Betting and Bribery
(a) No official of an Association or Club, Referee, Assistant Referees, player or Member shall bet on any football match. Member Associations and Member Clubs shall actively enforce this Rule.
(b) No Association or Club, or any player, official or member of any Association or Club shall offer or accept or attempt to offer, ether directly or indirectly, any consideration whatever to another Club, player or players of any other Club, with a view to influencing the result of a match.
第24條亦寫明會員、球員、球員職員等人不能：
Being a Bookmaker or Assistant to a Bookmaker or in any other way directly connected with the organizing of Betting Lotteries, Coupon Football Betting or the like without the written consent of the Association.
涉嫌違反呢一項的人可以被帶上紀律委員會受審〈見23條第5款〉

而有權投訴的人除左球證、董事同球會職員外，第29條亦清楚寫明球會同球員可以作出投訴。

再睇紀律章程，整份野冇講過打假球或者消極比賽的問題，但在2.3.3有呢一句：「不檢行為並沒有徹底的定義，亦不只限於在「罰則」內所列之不檢
行為。紀律小組有權因應有關情況判斷不檢行為之定義。」
另外，第4章亦有一項不檢行為叫「展示有違體育精神的行為」。

第3章第一條亦都講明，「紀律小組即使未有接獲以上列出的報告，但亦有權就接獲其他與賽事有關的人員﹝包括有關球會、足總職員或其他持有足總職銜的人士﹞於比賽期間或比賽後向紀律小組報告或投訴之有關任何不檢行為事宜作出處理。」
呢度的「以上列出的報告」即球賽報告。「與賽事有關的人員」後面的括號雖然冇講球員，但係有「包括」二字，換言之亦未將球員排除在外。而球員又點可以話同賽事無關？〈唔知球迷算唔算同球賽有關呢？〉

換言之，現在只要有投訴，紀律小組一定要做野。當然紀律小組無權搜查，查賬。但從證人的口供能否足以構成某些比打假波為輕的控罪？即使沒有入罪又能否藉開庭來嚇下人呢？要知道世界各地的足總足協都冇搜查權，但並不代表唔可以經聆訊後處罰涉嫌造假或者消極比賽的球員。

題外話：現時章程細則的23條第4款a係咁寫的：
No official of an Association or Club, Referee, Assistant Referees, player or Member shall bet on any football match. Member Associations and Member Clubs shall actively enforce this Rule.

係any football match

Muaythai MMA Videos